I hadn't heard of Tove Ditlevsen at all before
The Copenhagen Trilogy started showing up on all these best books of the year lists at the end of last year, and then it was as if everyone was reading her at once. At around the same time I started to take notice, my Women in Translation book club selected it as our next book. I doubt I would have gotten to it so quickly otherwise. I hate reading hardcovers, so I bought the three individual paperbacks even though it cost me an extra $15. It was nice to read them as separate books because I took a break between each to read something else, which I suppose I also could have done even if I had them in a single volume, but it felt totally natural with them being individual books. For some reason,
Childhood – the shortest book – took me the longest to read. I spread it over a few days. I read
Youth and
Dependency each in a single sitting. The books span Ditlevsen's early childhood until she left school at 14 (
Childhood), her teenage entry into the workforce, independent living, and early exposure to the literary world (
Youth), and her early adulthood, which was punctuated by a series of unhappy relationships and a Demerol addiction, but was also when she started to find literary success (
Dependency).
To me, Youth was the most interesting book. Having grown up in a working class family with a very narrow exposure to the world, Youth is Ditlevsen's coming of age story, when she starts to see different sides of the world, even as she feels an outsider in each. This was the book that also gave me the strongest sense of place among the three, perhaps because it's the book where she is moving around in the city the most. This was the pre-occupation Copenhagen of the early 1930s. War looms right over the border, but Ditlevsen and her friends are teenagers making just a little bit of money and looking for experiences. By the time Dependency picks up, Denmark is occupied by Germany and the freedom of movement that characterized Ditlevsen's youth is gone.
The other event in these books that really resonated for me was in Dependency, when nine months after giving birth to her first child, Ditlevsen became pregnant again and was determined to have an abortion. She asks every woman she knows for advice, she cold calls doctors, she tries home remedies. She eventually lands on a two-step procedure (not a botch, as I've seen it described), whereby one back-alley doctor renders the pregnancy unviable by piercing the amniotic sac (with, of course, no anesthesia). Then she's told to go home and wait. When she starts bleeding and gets a fever, she should rush herself to the legitimate doctor (who referred her to the back alley guy) where she is given condolences that the baby won't make it and the doctor completes the procedure by removing what remains. Similar to what I felt while reading Daddy's Gone A-Hunting, this unnecessary complication of a simple medical procedure seemed particularly relevant today.
I have a hard time with addiction stories. With everything I'd heard about it, I was nervous about reading Dependency but I think I needn't have been. The discussions of these books seem to focus so much on Ditlevsen's addiction, but when taken from the whole body of the work, this subject amounts to a rather small portion of her life story as told (though we understand at the conclusion it's a dominating force in her life story from the period when the addiction began until the present day – 1971 – when she wrote Dependency). The three books span about 30 years, during the last five of which Ditlevsen was addicted to opioids, mostly administered by her controlling third husband. I find that stories of addiction and recovery (and relapse, and recovery) often seem trite to the person who didn't experience them, and while there were a couple pieces of her story that were alarming, the narrative felt familiar and the end of the book strangely abrupt. (The highlight for me of the addiction section of Dependency was the housekeeper Jabbe, who seems to have been an absolute saint caring for Ditlevsen and her children throughout those five years, and being sole caretaker for her children during the six months Ditlevsen was in rehab.)
The writing in these books, as everyone everywhere has said, is clear and dispassionate even as Ditlevsen describes the most devastating events. It's also told largely in the present tense, and the effect is as if Ditlevsen is picturing these events in her memory and telling them out to us in the moment as she remembers them – like when a movie psychiatrist says to a patient, "Go back in your mind to that time. What do you see?" (Is this a real thing?) For the reader, it makes the places, people, and events in the book almost tangible; you're seeing them with her. It's quite something.