A mistake I am known to make is rushing to read a book before the movie comes out. I say this is a mistake, because inevitably what ends up happening is the book is then too fresh in my mind when I see the movie, and all I can see are the differences. I know this is something that's happened to me several times, but the example I remember most clearly is Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. The beginning or very nearly the beginning of the movie is set somewhere toward the middle of the events in the book and features a character whom, in the book, we believe – at that point in time – may be dead. This infuriated me on first watching the film, on Christmas Day of 2011, five months after finishing the book. I've since watched the movie several more times. The book has grown more and more distant in my memory, and the movie I quite like. I almost never do it on purpose, but I honestly think the better order of things is to watch a movie before reading the book it was adapted from. You will almost always get more out of the book, so it's unlikely to disappoint.
Last night, I watched the 2007 film Atonement, based on the Ian McEwan novel, which I read in 2003. In cases like this, when that much time has passed (or even half as much), between my reading of a book and the release of a movie, I find myself thinking I should re-read the book so it's fresh in my memory. I think I'm afraid seeing the movie will cancel out the book in my mind. But my experience watching Atonement suggests something else.
I really liked the book Atonement when I read it. I went on to read three other Ian McEwan books on the strength of my feelings about Atonement, none of which I liked as well. Nearly 20 years on, I remembered very little. I wasn't particularly interested in the movie when it came out. I remember being aware that it came out, but I don't remember hearing much about it. I imagine I thought it couldn't stand up to the book. It was only much more recently that I heard anything at all about the movie that made me curious. Specifically, it was something about the green dress Keira Knightly wears in the film. I'm not sure if it was this article or another, but I remember being surprised to learn the film featured any costume that was now considered iconic, given how little I'd heard about it at the time. Anyway, I can't say I thought about it much again until I was scrolling on HBO last night, saw that it was streaming, and rather impulsively decided to watch it. I really enjoyed it. I felt like I remembered just enough of the story – or perhaps more accurately that I'd forgotten just enough of the story.
I see on Goodreads I only gave Atonement 4 stars, but I suspect if I had rated it at the time I read it I would have given it 5. (In 2009, I went back and retroactively added and rated every book I'd read as far back as I kept records, so all ratings for books I read before 2009 are based on how much I remembered liking them in 2009.) I think my high opinion of the book faded a bit as acclaim for it grew. The other thing I see when I look up Atonement on Goodreads is a review by my ex-husband, written in 2007 – a year after we split up – though I am nearly certain he actually read the book while we were together. That this review exists is a surprise to me. I can only imagine that he meant to offend (maybe just to kid – maybe I'm thinking too badly of him) when he, apparently, suggested that Harry Potter fans would enjoy it. In any case, his middling opinion undoubtedly negatively affected my own feelings about the book (an unfortunate theme in our relationship). In any case, seeing the movie actually reminded me how much I once liked the book. Maybe I should watch more movies of books I read decades ago.



