Tuesday, September 22, 2020
Milkman, by Anna Burns
Monday, September 7, 2020
How To Travel without Seeing, by Andrés Neuman
The familiar and now absent (from my life at least) rhythm of airports, immigration, and travel pulses through this book, but that wasn't the only jarring aspect of reading this book. Neuman wrote this book in 2009, though it wasn't published in English until 2016. I would not have recalled, but 2009 was the year the world was on alert for swine flu. Particularly during the first legs of Neuman's journey, there was an odd ring of the present -- or of travel during those last weeks before the present. (I managed to take ten flights (and also to get off an eleventh after boarding, when the restrictions on European travel were announced in March) in the first few weeks of 2020, and I watched as the number of masks and the general tension at airports increased over that space of time.) Neuman crosses checkpoints where temperatures are taken, where health forms must be completed, where masks are worn. I think if I had read this a year ago, I would have found this surprising. What I found surprising reading it now was that I had missed it before. I did travel some in 2009, but I guess not to places where the swine flu was.
In fact, my reaction to the book's treatment of swine flu was just one example of an experience I had again and again while reading How To Travel without Seeing. The year 2009 is not so long ago, but (undoubtedly with some exceptions I can't think of right now) I am hard pressed to name an event that happened in 2009. Ok: I know there was Obama's inauguration at the beginning of the year. In fact, it was rather an eventful year in my personal life, but larger global events -- aside from the Obama presidency, and all that goes along with it -- there's nothing I could swear happened in 2009, and not a year earlier, a year later. But this book, written as it was as a (more or less) pure reflection of the present in 2009, had all kinds of references to current events that struck me: was that in 2009? and was that also in 2009? Much of this was related to Latin American politics, which I can't say I've ever followed closely. So, at the time of the book's writing, Lula was president of Brazil and was an established popular leader in South America; Evo Morales was just completing his first term as president of Bolivia; Chávez was still alive and Nicolás Maduro was an ambassador of some sort (he comes up!); FARC was still active in Colombia, but things were changing fast there; and -- the event that was most notable in the book, in part because it coincided perfectly with the author's time in Latin America, as well as preventing his planned stop in Tegucigalpa -- the coup was taking place in Honduras, which unlike everything else I've mentioned, I don't even remember as an event.
As well as following local politics, Neuman makes a point to seek out local writers, and a good portion of the book is devoted to excerpted pieces or reflections he's had on reading poems, essays, and stories by authors from the countries he visited. Most were not writers with whom I was familiar, though of course the big names come up (again and again): Borges, Cortázar, Vargas Llosa, García Márquez, Bolaño. I was gratified to find Eduardo Halfon's writing come up when Neuman visited Guatemala (and slightly disappointed that Horacio Castellanos Moya's did not come up when he visited El Salvador). I looked up a couple of the writers whose names I didn't know and didn't find anything in English, though I'd like to do a more thorough investigation.
A couple chapters in, I was trying to figure out what this book reminded me of and I came to an unexpected conclusion: Walter Benjamin's Arcades Project. It's not just that it's similarly fragmented, though obviously that's part of it. It's definitely more of a personal piece, and also very rooted in the present. But the mixture of observations and fragments of other writing, the sense of a thesis behind it all, some thoughts just one sentence (e.g., "The sharp Paraguayan sigh."), it all had a feeling that reminded me of the Arcades Project. I can tell you the line where it hit me, from page 74: "Here the cars are like cable cars." (Though I can't tell you why that was the line where it hit me.)
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
Grove: A Field Novel, by Esther Kinsky
Grove is divided into three parts, which cover several trips to Italy taken by the narrator. The first and third part are solo trips in some rough present, in the wake of the death of a partner, about whom you learn little. Both are winter trips to out of the way places, or places reserved for summer vacations. In the middle section, the narrator recalls what seems to have been frequent childhood trips to Italy with her family. Her father, repelled by eels, and fascinated by the Etruscans, Byzantine mosaics, and Fra Angelico, brings his family to Italy to follow his passions.
Sunday, August 23, 2020
The Intuitionist, by Colson Whitehead
I haven't been in the mood to read. Or perhaps I haven't been reading the right things. Or perhaps (and I do think this is the root of it) my mental energy has been sapped by work and I haven't had it in me to read. (Is that different from not being "in the mood"? Who can say.) The week before last, I continued to read Grove in small bits and I got through the second section (out of three) in it. I also participated in a week-long #1000wordsofsummer beginning August 10. The two-week #1000wordsofsummer hit at a time when I was very busy with work and I didn't feel up to it, but when this one came up, even though I was again (still?) very busy with work, I decided to give it a go. I wrote upwards of 1000 words on 6 of the 7 days (and 500 and change on one of them), and ended the week with some 9500 words. (On one of those days, I wrote the >1000-word love letter to markets that was my last post here.) Grove turns out to be a very good book to read when I want to write. Or maybe just a very good book for what I've mostly been writing, which is memories of travel. That is, in fact, much of what Grove is, and it's definitely been part of my inspiration.
Last weekend, in a very unusual turn of events this side of COVID, I didn't read at all. I had to work half a day or so on Saturday, and after that I just laid around on the couch for a while, cooked dinner at 4pm, and then watched TV the rest of the evening. Sunday, I ran two errands, which involved walking 4 miles in total, and I discovered that I haven't kept in shape quite as much as I'd hoped (my legs were very sore on Monday). But it was nice to be out. It was in the 60s and rainy here, and I wore long pants and a jacket and it felt pleasantly cool. Monday morning, I thought about resuming Grove, but decided to take a week away and started The Intuitionist instead. Given that the last time I took a break from Grove, I chose a 700-page book and then also had to read another book for a book club, I thought I'd be smarter and pick something short, something that might last me a few days, and then I could go back to Grove refreshed, or at least sated in my desire for plot. But that's not quite how it worked out. It wasn't The Intuitionist's fault. I made decent headway Monday and Tuesday, but I barely touched it Wednesday and didn't at all on Thursday. I thought I could catch up on Friday because my day theoretically ends early on summer Fridays, but I didn't actually end early, and only had a little time with it before I had to do other things. Finally, yesterday, I went back to it and read in earnest. And then I read the full second half ("half" in how the book is broken up, it's actually less than half) this morning before I had to work again at 12:30.
Wednesday, August 12, 2020
A Love Letter to Some Markets I've Visited
Sunday, August 9, 2020
Convenience Store Woman, by Sayaka Murata
As I wrote yesterday, I had a book I had to finish ahead of a book club meeting this morning. That book was Convenience Store Woman, by Sayaka Murata, which was this month's selection for the Idlewild Books Women in Translation book club. (As it happens, August is Women in Translation Month. Go read some women in translation!)
This is a slim book (160 pages, but smaller than standard trade paperback size) that I read in a couple hours yesterday. The narrator, Keiko, is a 36-year-old woman who has been working in a convenience store for half her life. It's never spelled out, but Keiko is likely neuroatypical. Her job at the convenience store comes with training and a manual that serve as a model for being for Keiko. She recognizes that she is not what other people consider normal, but she learns to appear normal by mimicking them, with a deep understanding of what she's doing. She borrows other people's patterns of speech, but will combine different patterns to suit the occasion. Her deep self-awareness makes her aware of this behavior in other people too, where they probably don't even see it themselves. For instance, she observes that her sister has changed after she has a baby, and she attributes it to the time she is likely spending with other parents. Her observation of other people was, for me, one of the most interesting aspects of the book.
Convenience Store Woman shared certain similarities with a book I read earlier this year, Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine. Like Keiko, Eleanor devotes much of her own attention to appearing normal and generally going unnoticed. But Eleanor suffers from PTSD, and her story is one of recovery and entering "normal" society. Keiko goes some length toward trying to take a path that would seem more typical for a woman her age, but her self-discovery is that she belongs in the convenience store.
Saturday, August 8, 2020
The Three Musketeers, by Alexandre Dumas
I dug myself into a bit of a hole last weekend. I still have The Famished Road and Light Years sitting unfinished (187 pages into the former and 160 pages into the latter) on the table beside my couch. About two weeks ago, after finishing Emma, I started a new book: Grove by Esther Kinsky. It's a beautifully written book about loss and solitude and travel and Italy, which I will write about eventually when I finish it. I read it for five days, Monday through Friday of the week before last, and arrived, on the Friday, at the end of Part One. It was very slow going. The chapters are short, which keeps things moving in a way, but I found myself pausing a lot, thinking a lot, writing a little, and actually starting up my Italian studies again. (All of these are positives, it's true.) But Grove is not the sort of book you dive into for a weekend of reading and that was the sort of book I thought I needed last weekend. So, I set Grove aside and I picked up The Three Musketeers last Saturday. I read about 70 pages that day and another 70 or so on Sunday. Almost immediately I had the thought that it had been foolish of me to take a break from one book with another book that was nearly 700 pages long -- especially foolish considering there was yet another book I needed to read for a book club meeting a week later (that is, tomorrow as I'm writing this). The visions of arriving at this weekend -- today -- with five unfinished books on my side table loomed over me. Fortunately, as the days passed -- even as I was back to working during the week -- my reading pace picked up. Late Thursday, it occurred to me I might actually be able to finish The Three Musketeers on Friday (thanks to my work's summer Fridays early closure) and start today fresh with just my book club book to finish. And I did: I read just over 200 pages yesterday and finished it just in time for my weekly Friday night movie club screening.
This was the second Dumas book I've read. The first was The Count of Monte Cristo, which I enjoyed despite the poor translation (which I have written about previously). The edition of The Three Musketeers that I read was translated by Richard Pevear, which was part of the attraction for me. I knew this wouldn't have the stumbling adherence to the French syntax that made The Count of Monte Cristo so awkward. I hoped that my enjoyment of the story would benefit as a result. I was not disappointed. I also feel fortunate that I didn't actually know the story of The Three Musketeers at all. In fact, my primary awareness of them came from crosswords, where they are occasionally answers (Athos most frequently), and which was how I came to know their names (and which was also the source of much confusion on my part, prior to reading the book, about the fact that there were clearly four of them, not three). But beyond the names, I knew nothing. The book is an action-packed delight. The distinct characters of the musketeers themselves, and of their lackeys, were wonderfully entertaining. Milady, the evil genius villain, is incredible. I'd love to read an alternate version centering her story!
Sunday, July 26, 2020
Emma, by Jane Austen
I very rarely reread books. I like the idea of rereading, but with limited time and unlimited books, the previously unread always seems to get priority of place for me. I first read Emma in 2005. I was something of a latecomer to Jane Austen, as I wrote when I reread Pride and Prejudice in 2016. I first read that book in November of 2004 when I was subletting an apartment and ran out of my own reading material. About a year after that I went back and read the remainder of her novels in the space of just a few weeks (pausing somewhere in the middle to also read The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling). If my record-keeping is accurate, I read Emma right in the middle of the pack: Sense and Sensibility and Mansfield Park before; Northanger Abbey, (Tom Jones), Lady Susan, and Persuasion after. Reading them all in such quick succession was, I think, not such a good idea in the end. They all kind of blended together. For reasons that probably don't have much to do with merit, Mansfield Park and Northanger Abbey are the ones that stood out for me. (And Tom Jones, which I adored, and was, I have to say, a refreshing break from Jane Austen.)I started rereading Emma back in February to refresh my memory ahead of the new film adaptation. But this was during that period this year when I was sick and none of my reading was going well and I set it aside after about 25 pages. I didn't think I'd go back any time soon, but then my friend group who have been watching movies together (that is to say, simultaneously in our own homes) throughout quarantine selected Clueless as our film for last week. I had just finished Romance in Marseille and Emma seemed like it would be a fun change from what I'd been reading lately.







